MAIX8 Research
← All research

Every Risk Asset I Can Measure Went Up This Year. Bitcoin Went Down 44%.

$BTC

Every Risk Asset I Can Measure Went Up This Year. Bitcoin Went Down 44%.

$BTC moves with the S&P 500 about half the time. Over the last year the S&P made a new high and Bitcoin lost nearly half its value. Both of those are true, and holding them together is the whole point.

THE YEAR, SIDE BY SIDE

  S&P 500        +21.24%   sitting at 100.0% of its own yearly range
  Nasdaq         +25.00%   at 87.7%
  Gold           +22.79%   at 41.4%
  $BTC           -44.55%

Every risk asset I can measure went up. Bitcoin went down by nearly as much as they went up. Against the S&P alone that is a 65.8 percentage-point gap in twelve months.

THE CORRELATION, WHICH SAYS THE OPPOSITE

  vs S&P 500      0.50   over 251 shared sessions
  vs Nasdaq       0.50
  vs VIX          -0.43
  vs Gold         0.19

Half a correlation with equities. A clear negative one with volatility — when the VIX rises, Bitcoin falls, exactly as a risk asset should.

So which is it? Both, and the confusion between them is where most cross-market commentary goes wrong. **Correlation describes days. It says nothing about levels.** Two series can move together on most days and still finish a year on opposite sides of flat, because a small persistent drift swamps a lot of shared noise. That is precisely what happened.

The practical version: on any given day, US equity strength helps Bitcoin. Over a year, it did not save it.

WHAT THAT RULES OUT

It rules out "risk-off is dragging crypto down". Risk is not off. The VIX sits at 14.6% of its yearly range — the options market is charging almost the least it has all year to insure against a fall. Equities are at 100.0% of theirs.

It also rules out the comfortable version, that Bitcoin has decoupled into its own asset class. A 0.50 correlation is not decoupled. It is attached, and underperforming while attached.

That leaves the least flattering explanation, and I hold it loosely: this is crypto-specific. Not a macro storm. Something the asset class is doing to itself while everything around it rises.

WHERE THAT LEAVES VALUATION

  MVRV Z-score      0.37 at the 17.9th percentile of 1461 days
  fear and greed    25 (Extreme Fear), all month inside 20-33
  RSI               48.7

Cheap on chain, fearful in sentiment, and falling against a market that is doing fine. Cheapness is not a catalyst. It is a condition, and it can persist for as long as the thing making crypto underperform keeps going.

BIAS: WAIT

Not on the macro. The macro is about as friendly as it gets — high equities, cheap volatility. If Bitcoin cannot rise into that, the problem is not the weather.

What would change it: Bitcoin outperforming the S&P over a month rather than tracking it down. That is the smallest piece of evidence that would mean anything, and it has not happened.

Are you watching crypto's charts, or the ones it is losing to?

Educational research, not financial advice. DYOR.

Originally published on Binance Square · read it there